Granton & District’s offline, face-to-face budget consultation

As most of you know, I’m all about Community Councils using the internet to engage with citizens. But I’m well aware that the internet isn’t, and can never be, the only channel for CC-citizen relationships.
So I’m immensely impressed by Granton & District CC’s initiative to consult with their citizens by offline, face-to-face methods, and then deliver meaningful results straight to its Local Authority.

Feedback and thoughts 2

It was pleasing to receive another response to our report, mostly because of its format. The responder’s email address clearly indicated his/her position (a CC member) and name, and the actual community council. Better still, the header and footer reaffirmed this information, and included the CC’s contact address, web address and a phone number. This CC is in a relatively large town – the header and footer stated which part of the town this CC represented. Continue reading

Is it all deliberate dereliction of duty?

The results of our 2014 survey of Community Councils’ internet use have gathered some interest, especially after Peter wrote about the massive churn in online presences.

(Click the graphic to see a full-sized PDF.)
The rings’ outer diameters represent the numbers in each status in 2014. Inner diameters represent the amount of ‘churn’, i.e. the sum of the numbers that left or entered this status since 2012.

The rings’ outer diameters represent the numbers in each status in 2014. Inner diameters represent the amount of ‘churn’, i.e. the sum of the numbers that left or entered this status since 2012.

Continue reading